Virginia Beach Sheriffs Assault 65-year-old ADA Advocate

THE VIRGINIA SHERIFFS ASSAULT 65-year-old - white Certified ADA Advocate

By Sheriffs: Dickerson & Rupert

While trying to keep eyes on a 140 lb Black man being over-mastered and also brutally assaulted by Sheriffs

The Rights of Individuals with Disabilities

The Importance of Having an ADA Advocate in the Courtroom

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) enacted in 1990 is a landmark legislation that provides comprehensive protections against discrimination for individuals with disabilities in various aspects of society, including the legal system. One crucial aspect of this protection is the right of individuals with disabilities to have an ADA advocate present in the courtroom. This explores the significance of this right and the impact it has on ensuring equal access to justice

for individuals with disabilities.

Ensuring Equal Access to Justice

Individuals with disabilities, whether visible or invisible, may face unique challenges when navigating the legal system. From physical barriers to communication difficulties, these obstacles can hinder their ability to effectively participate in court proceedings. Having an ADA advocate by their side can help bridge these gaps and ensure that their rights are upheld throughout the legal process.

The ADA advocate serves as a guide and support system for individuals with disabilities, helping them understand legal procedures, communicate their needs effectively, and advocate for their rights in court. By providing necessary accommodations and assistance, the advocate empowers individuals with disabilities to fully engage in the legal process and have their voices heard.

Moreover, the presence of an ADA advocate in the courtroom sends a powerful message about inclusivity and equality. It demonstrates society's commitment to upholding the rights of individuals with disabilities and creating a more inclusive justice system. By recognizing the importance of ADA advocates, the legal system acknowledges that everyone, regardless of ability, deserves fair and equal treatment under the law.

Protecting Vulnerable Populations

Individuals with disabilities are often part of vulnerable populations that are at a higher risk of being marginalized or discriminated against in the legal system. Having an ADA advocate by their side can help protect them from undue harm or exploitation, ensuring that their rights are respected and their interests are represented effectively.

The presence of an ADA advocate can also help address issues of bias or discrimination that individuals with disabilities may face in court. By advocating for fair treatment and accommodations, the advocate plays a critical role in challenging stereotypes and promoting a more inclusive

and accessible legal system.

The right of individuals with disabilities to have an ADA Advocate in the courtroom is a crucial component of ensuring equal access to justice for all. By providing support, guidance, and advocacy, ADA advocates empower individuals with disabilities to participate fully in court proceedings and uphold their rights under the law. This right not only promotes inclusivity and equality but also serves as a powerful tool for protecting vulnerable populations and challenging discrimination in the legal system. Ultimately, the presence of ADA advocates in the courtroom signifies a commitment to justice and fairness for individuals with disabilities, helping to create a more just and equitable society for all.

Comments

The VIRGINIA STATE BAR Misuse of POWER to Silence Rhetta M. Daniel

A feud lasting nearly four decades between a Virginia lawyer and the Virginia State Bar (VSB) is coming to a head Daniel and the VSB Rhetta Daniel has been practicing law in Virginia for almost forty years; from 1982 - 1920 she worked as a Senior Assistant Bar Counsel for the VSB, prosecuting bad lawyers for them. These proceedings could lead to the removal of a lawyer's license to practice law, and as such their ability to continue to practice law. Daniel said she was pushed out as the Senior Assistant Bar Counsel in 1990 after it became clear that her aggressive style was not welcome and that the VSB was more interested in protecting connected attorneys than weeding out unscrupulous ones. The specific case was My Linh Soland, a client who had two powerful lawyers. "What they did was protect her defense counsel," Daniel said. She explained that a letter that may have doctored the attorney's letterhead was in the possession of her...

Should a Judge be allowed to steal a child from a Mother without knowing the full story and Lawyers gaslighting and or not telling the whole TRUTH of the issues

Should a Judge be allowed to steal a child from a Mother without knowing the full story and Lawyers gaslighting and or not telling the whole TRUTH of the issues A Virginia Mom faces the loss of her parental rights for a son she primarily raised for the first six years of his life. The Set Up Natalia Dalton in the City of Alexandria, Virginia spent the first six years of her sons life as his primary caregiver. She and her ex-boyfriend Julio LaCayo had a son in 2008. They were never married, and custody was always arranged in some part through court orders the entirety of her son’s life. For the first six years of his life, Natalia had physical custody, her son thrived in school under her care. “There was one court hearing during that time over the sons passport.” Dalton noted. In 2013, that all changed. Indeed, t...

Virginia Judicial Interviews Go “Off the Rails” “This is a f**king shitshow” Virginia Courts are RACIST, PREDATORY & DISHONEST

Virginia Legislature - Courts of Justice Virginia Judicial Interviews Go “Off the Rails” “This is a f**king shitshow” when the SECRECY of CHOOSING JUDGES IS CHALLENGED By: The Public THIS SHOWS HOW AND WHERE THE CORRUPTION IN THE COURTS OF VIRGINIA Virginia Courts are RACIST, PREDATORY & DISHONEST Twice a year and maybe more the Courts of Justice of Virginia choices NEW JUDGES and RENEWS old Judges, and the JIRC committee members. This is done as SECRETLY as they can. The information is difficult to find on the site and emails with the times of the meeting are not usually on auto email as other meetings are. You should remember when a complaint of a Judge or lawyer is made all should take it very seriously, in Virginia it is ignored. That Justice in Virginia is only available for the very Rich and Powerful. JudicalPedia.com was launched in July of 2020 to show this. The Dark Side A...

City of Alexandria Police ignore "Money Laundering" by Asst Chief Raul Pedroso"

CITY OF ALEXANDRIA POLICE TOOLS OF “THE OLD BOYS” NETWORK OF VIRGINIA THE “BIG LIE” and THE “BIG COVER-UP” “THE TRUTH” of Lawyers & Judges in the City of Alexandria can be found here in this Blog & VALAW2010.Blogspot.com along with JudicialPedia.com https://www.alexandriava.gov/RedactionLog The current Chief of Police for the City of Alexandria is Tarrick McGuire appears to be raciest interesting from Arlington, Texas where are City Manager James Parajon is from and our Governor of Virginia Youngkin appears to have business’s Along with Interim Police Chief now Assistant Chief Raul Pedroso - don’t know the law and or both are paid to “Cover-up” for the City of Alexandria “Elite” Judges & Lawyers who allow “False and Fraudulent" documents to create “Deed Theft” “Hate Crimes” The “FAKE & Fraudulent” Documents that are filed in the City of Alexandria Clerk's office that are supported by:...

Wells Fargo Bank Illegal Foreclosure of 15 W. Spring St., Alexandria, VA

You may have seen 15 W. Spring St., Alexandria VA on the Market FOR SALE The SALE is in REVENGE by TROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS aka MAYS & VALENTINE For EXPOSING Their MANIPULATION and TAMPERING with or STEALING FROM TRUST ACCOUNTS that they MANIPULATED $30.000.00 in 1990 from Janice Wolk Grenadier to COVER-UP TROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS aka MAYS & VALENTINE - claims to be the lawyer for Wells Fargo Bank -"OOPS" Wells Fargo Bank in taped conversations and when responding to subpoenas had no clue TROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS aka MAYS & VALENTINE was or is their lawyer Read More: https://judicialpedia.com/listing/criminal-trust-theft-by-lawyer-jim-arthur-of-troutman-pepper-hamilton-sanders-aka-mays-valentine-cover-up-of-trust-theft-by-divorce-lawyer-ilona-ely-freedman-grenadier-heckman-of-sonia-grenadier/ The home was illegally foreclosed on in March of 2018 It was an illegal Foreclosure - Here are the documents to prove it: It has been stated...

Virginia State Bar Celebrates the Pattern & Practice of its Corruption

March 13, 2023 Ilona Grenadier Heckman Receives the 2023 Lifetime Achievement Award FOR: STEALING from TRUST ACCOUNTS, STEALING From SONIA GRENADIER & her family, STEALING from JANICE WOLK GRENADIER et al, LYING in COURT, LYING in COURT DOCUMENTS HATING CATHOLICS With the help of: Ben DiMuro of DiMuro Ginsburg - past President of the Virginia State Bar & donation of 10% of his Estate & Troutman Pepper aka Mays & Valentine, aka Troutman Sanders, aka Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP is a nationwide presence, with more than 1,200 lawyers across 23 U.S. offices & Despite a significant group lateral departure hitting the firm in early 2023, Troutman Pepper Hamilton & Sanders saw its financial performance h...

The “Old Boys Network” of Virginia Doing it Again - with the collusion of Judges and Lawyers - Ensuring they DRAIN the Estate & Destroy a Family

The “Old Boys Network” of Virginia Doing it Again with the collusion of Judges and Lawyers Ensuring they DRAIN the Estate & Destroy a Family The SCHEME one the “Old Boys Network” of Virginia uses Time and Time again At first blush the case: JACQUELINE BOGLE MEUSE, individually and derivatively on behalf of, ALEXANDRIA INVESTMENTS, LLC, BOGLE INDUSTRIES, INC., KING STREET METRO VENTURE, LLC, 4607 EISENHOWER ASSOCIATES, LLC, 4601 EISENHOWER ASSOCIATES, LLC, and THE IRREVOCABLE BOGLE TRUST, Petitioners – Appellants, v. BRUCE HENRY, individually and as the Co-Trustee of t...

The State of Pennsylvania "Cash for the Elderly" is MURDERING the elderly for profit of Judges "friends"

The State of Pennsylvania "Cash for the Elderly" is MURDERING the elderly for the profit of Judges "friends" Genevieve Bush 89 of Chester County, Pennsylvania Before the Guardianship Today Nearly a decade in, Genevieve Bush, 89, continues to be held in guardianship against her will, against advanced directives, her life savings is nearly depleted. The Estate Battle Bush’s saga started approximately fifteen years ago, when Genevieve Bush’s sons, Joseph and Michael, challenged the estate of her and her husband. After her husband had a stroke and was hospitalized in November 2003, they saw an opening, according to a letter she wrote in 2007, to her brother Leon. “In April 2004, before Fabian (her husband) passed, Joseph asked me to sign a blank check…Joe asked me to sign more blank checks so he could move the money…In May of 2005, Joe called me and told me he was putting stocks in my name…Then, (a) month later in June, Joe ...

Treason by Chief Justice John Roberts

Case No. 23-7758 SCOTUS COVER-UP Of United States Federal Courts Judges TREASON by Chief Justice John Roberts Treason, in legal terms, is the crime of betraying one's country or government, typically by levying war against it or giving aid and comfort to its enemies, and is defined in the U.S. Constitution. The link to: SCOTUS Writ of Mandamus & Prohibition for Investigation into USDC of District of Columbia for Political & Religions BIAS by Judges https://judicialpedia.com/listing/scotus-writ-of-mandamus-prohibition-for-investigation-into-usdc-of-district-of-columbia-for-political-religions-bias-by-judges-et-al/ Not a Defendant but, To be Investigated: The Court - United States District Court o...

Why do Judges Believe they have "ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY"

THE MUTILATION / STERILIZATION of a 15 year old young girl HAS GIVEN THE “ CASE LAW” not the “LAW” used by JUDGES across the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA to FALSELY BELIEVE THAT JUDGES are “ABOVE THE LAW” and have “ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY” Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978) No. 76-1750 Argued January 10, 1978 Decided March 28, 1978 Syllabus A mother filed a petition in affidavit from in an Indiana Circuit Court, a court of general jurisdiction under an Indiana statute, for authority to have her "somewhat retarded" 15-year-old daughter (a respondent here) sterilized, and petitioner Circuit Judge approved the petition the same day in an ex parte proceeding without a hearing and without notice to the daughter or appointment of a guardian ad litem. The operation was performed shortly thereafter, the daughter having been told that she was to have her appendix removed. ...

American Legal News

Search This Blog