Case No. 23-7758
SCOTUS COVER-UP
Of United States Federal Courts Judges
TREASON
by Chief Justice John Roberts
Treason, in legal terms, is the crime of betraying one's country or government, typically by levying war against it or giving aid and comfort to its enemies, and is defined in the U.S. Constitution.
The link to: SCOTUS Writ of Mandamus & Prohibition for Investigation into USDC of District of Columbia for Political & Religions BIAS by Judges
Not a Defendant but, To be Investigated:
The Court - United States District Court of the District of Columbia
Steven Gallagher The United States District Court of the District of Columbia, Office of the Circuit Executive Deputy Circuit Executive Exhibit B is being served a copy for the Judges as it was his responsibility to investigate it appears.
The Judges that Janice Wolk Grenadier (Certified ADA Advocate & Mediator, Founder of JudicialPedia.com) is requesting an investigation into / for
https://www.scribd.com/document/743139838/1-SCOTUS-Writ-Ex-A-E-20240615-085015
Janice Wolk Grenadier,
the January 6 Defendants, and
the fairness of the retirement of Chief Judge Richard Roberts (who raped a 16 year old): (https://judicialpedia.com/listing/chief-judge-richard-w-roberts-rapes-a-16-year-old-and-is-not-held-accountable-for-30-years-the-judge-retired-early-with-all-benefits-it-was-reported-that-he-would-be-making-more-retired-than-worki/)
Exhibit F a list by the Department of Justice that shows the crimes and the OUTRAGEOUS sentences of the Defendants
https://www.scribd.com/document/743140258/2-Scotus-Ex-f-j6-Doj-Sentencing-20240615-085244
Exhibit G -1 is also a list of January 6 Defendants that have and have not had their day in court. It is unbelievable almost 4 years later they are still arresting people who were there.
https://www.scribd.com/document/743140514/3-SCOTUS-Ex-G-Ex-1-3-20240615-085641 &
https://www.scribd.com/document/743140514/3-SCOTUS-Ex-G-Ex-1-3-20240615-085641%20
Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Merrick Garland aka Attorney General
Past Chief Judge Richard Roberts who ignored the complaints from Petitioner Exhibit E is a letter JWG wrote to him in 2015 and when he raped a 16 year old he retired early to avoid accountability with the apparent help of Judge Beryl A. Howell and Chief Judge Merrick Garland (who claimed he had recused himself)
Chief Judge Merrick Garland (aka AG)
District Judge Rudolph Contreras
District Judge Christopher R. Cooper
District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan
District Judge Randolph D. Moss
District Judge Amit P. Mehta
District Judge Timothy J. Kelly
District Judge Trevor N. McFadden
District Judge Dabney L. Friedrich
District Judge Carl J. Nichols
District Judge Jia M. Cobb
District Judge Ana C. Reyes
District Judge Loren L. AliKhan
Senior Judge Royce C. Lamberth
Senior Judge Paul L. Friedman
Senior Judge Emmet G. Sullivan
Senior Judge Reggie B. Walton
Senior Judge John D. Bates
Senior Judge Richard J. Leon
Senior Judge Barbara J. Rothstein (visiting)
Senior Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Senior Judge Amy Berman Jackson
Senior Judge Beryl A. Howell aka Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell
Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey
Magistrate Judge Robin M. Meriweather
Magistrate Judge Zia M. Faruqui
Magistrate Judge Moxila A. Upadhyaya
The United States District Court of the District of Columbia, Office of the Circuit Executive Deputy Circuit Executive, Steven Gallagher Exhibit B
It also includes Chief Judge of the District of Columbia Appeals Court Merrick Garland now Attorney
General, he helped create and participated in the “hate” crime of religion, and political views et al as Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and now as Attorney General.
This court and the Judges have shown their ability to collude, conspire, and be complicit with willful knowledgeable intent to pick and choose who gets justice and who doesn’t violating Citizens of the United States Constitutional and Civil Rights
What makes this even more disturbing and chilling is the fact that this is the Civil Rights Court of the United States of America:
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia holds a unique and significant position when it comes to civil rights due to its historical legacy, jurisdiction, and impact on national policy. Established in 1863, this federal court boasts a rich history of handling groundbreaking civil rights cases that have shaped the legal landscape of the United States.
One key aspect that sets the District of Columbia Court apart is its jurisdiction over cases involving the federal government. As the nation's capital, Washington D.C. is home to numerous federal agencies and offices, making it a hub for civil rights cases related to government actions and policies. This gives the court a central role in holding the federal government accountable and ensuring that civil rights are upheld at the highest level.
Furthermore, the District of Columbia Court's proximity to the halls of power in the nation's capital allows it to have a direct influence on national civil rights policy. Cases heard in this court often garner significant attention and can set important precedents that impact civil rights across the country. The court's decisions have the potential to shape laws and policies that affect not only residents of D.C. but also individuals nationwide.
In addition, the diverse population of the District of Columbia and its status as a symbol of freedom and democracy further underscore the court's importance in protecting civil rights.
The court plays a crucial role in ensuring that all individuals, regardless of race, gender, religion, or other characteristics, are treated fairly and have their civil rights upheld.
Overall, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia stands out as a special entity when it comes to civil rights due to its historical significance, jurisdiction over federal cases, influence on national policy, and commitment to upholding civil rights for all individuals. It continues to be a vital institution in the fight for justice and equality in the United States.
But, where it started was when Janice Wolk Grenadier sued 43 Federal Judges Case No. 1:17-cv-1106-HEH https://judicialpedia.com/listing/civil-rights-constitutional-judge-henry-hudson/
The Judges sued:
Chief Judge Honorable Rebecca Beach Smith
USDC of Eastern Division of Virginia
Judge Leonie M. Brinkema, Judge Gerald Bruce Lee, Judge Liam O'Grady, Judge Anthony J. Trenga, Senior Judge James C. Cacheris, Senior Judge Claude M. Hilton, Senior Judge T.S. Ellis, III, Magistrate Judge Theresa C. Buchanan, Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson, Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis, Magistrate Judge Michael Nachmanoff, Magistrate Judge T. Rawles Jones, Jr.
Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
Chief Judge Roger L. Gregory, Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, Judge Paul V. Niemeyer, Judge Diana Gribbon Motz, Judge William B. Traxler, Jr. Judge Robert B. King, Judge Dennis W. Shedd, Judge Allyson K. Duncan, Judge G. Steven Agee, Judge Barbara Milano Keenan, Judge James A. Wynn, Jr. Judge Albert Diaz, Judge Henry F. Floyd, Judge Stephanie D. Thacker, Judge Pamela A. Harris, Senior Judge Clyde H. Hamilton, Senior Judge Andre M. Davis
USDC of the District of Columbia
Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell, District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, District Judge James E. Boasberg, District Judge Amy Berman Jackson, District Judge Rudolph Contreras, Senior Judge Royce C. Lamberth, Senior Judge Ellen S. Huvelle, Senior Judge Reggie B. Walton, Senior Judge Richard J. Leon, Senior Judge Rosemary M. Collyer
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit
Chief Judge: MERRICK B. GARLAND
US Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Alexandria)
Judge Brian Kenney, Judge Stephen Mitchell
Comments
Post a Comment