Virginia Judicial Interviews Go “Off the Rails” “This is a f**king shitshow” Virginia Courts are RACIST, PREDATORY & DISHONEST

 

Virginia Legislature - Courts of Justice 

Virginia Judicial Interviews Go “Off the Rails”

“This is a f**king shitshow”  

when the SECRECY of CHOOSING JUDGES IS CHALLENGED

By: The Public 

THIS SHOWS HOW AND WHERE THE CORRUPTION IN THE COURTS OF VIRGINIA

Virginia Courts are RACIST, PREDATORY & DISHONEST

Twice a year and maybe more the Courts of Justice of Virginia choices NEW JUDGES and RENEWS old Judges, and the JIRC committee members.   

This is done as SECRETLY as they can.  The information is difficult to find on the site and emails with the times of the meeting are not usually on auto email as other meetings are. 

You should remember when a complaint of a Judge or lawyer is made all should take it very seriously,  in Virginia it is ignored.  

That Justice in Virginia is only available for the very Rich and Powerful.  JudicalPedia.com was launched in July of 2020 to show this.  

The Dark Side  A law treatise on judging 

By Caroline George Dougles, J.D.  x-wife to 

Congressman & New Hampshire Supreme Court Chief Judge Charles G. Douglas, III

Country Club Rules of Judges

Private Court Club Rules and Responsibilities (unwritten, unspoken, yet mandatory)

1. Members pledge their first allegiance to judges. This means unquestionable loyalty.

2. Members pay dues and all Court Financial Obligations promptly.

3. Members volunteer help to insiders over outsiders, and may expect reciprocity (Eventually).   a member favor begets  a reciprocal obligation back to the member or his designate.

4.  Favors (and these rules) are mentally noted and tallied, not recorded or formally written down.

5. Members practice conformity, they may not descent outside the club. They must practice loyalty to all judges, but especially those who support them with fees and case referrals. All members (plus others who function in any part of the court system) are to treat every judge as a top-boss.

6.  Maintain and promote exclusivity. Do not help outsiders, as they are competition for legal fees, and are not really qualified to appear in court without a member. Outsiders represent dangerous wild cards, requiring ultimate control and Swift and Harsh punishment.

7. Ordinary citizens will obey and give deference to all members, especially judges, (regardless of judicial error, mistake, or bias.) members hold an inherent superiority over laypeople in court.

8.  Keep club disciplinary business within the clubhouse. This means no whistleblowing, public criticism are Judges' complaints.

9. Speak nicely to other members in court - practice unnatural civility in the face of adversity. While obnoxious, manipulative behavior is understood to be part of the professional legal persona, it is to be masked with Ritualistic Clubhouse language and customs in court.

10. Club rules and the honor code are all members, but they are secret and have a flexible interpretation for different circumstances and people (depending on Rank, Chits, and Judicial Favors.)

11.  Club membership means this class is more qualified than any other to handle legal problems. Lay people need legal technicians are not to be trusted. To maintain order and law, it is an obsessive requirement that lay people be deferential at all times, and they be made to respect a judge by showing difference as they obey.

12.  Loss of control over laypeople means anarchy. Each lay individual is to be treated as a threat to be controlled by the entire profession / system. Diligence and maintaining control is a professional obsession. 

For this book,  the powerful in this club are called INSIDERS or OL’BOYS.  If a club member is very connected, privileged and influential, I may refer to him using both terms (INSIDER and OL”BOY- capitalized or not.  What is not capitalized in this club are individuals, common people, outsiders, most court users and member whistleblowers.  

Special thanks was given to Linda Kennedy who lost her license to practice law for standing up and speaking out.  Linda Kennedy also did an intervene in support of  JWG CASE NO:  1:17-cv-1106 HEH  USDC of the Eastern Division (Alexandria)  JWG sued 43 Federal Judges for ignoring the information included in this recuse and other information. https://judicialpedia.com/listing/civil-rights-constitutional-judge-henry-hudson/  

That it is so rampant in Virginia that more and more people are standing up and speaking out - This  is just one of the people’s videos for February of 2021:  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lfoZjGQvM0&t=190s   Where the Court’s of Justice for just questioning having  an applicant to become a Circuit Court Judge questioned  for the City of Alexandria Circuit Court Judgeship goes “CRAZY”

After watching this - you might understand how and why we have a corrupt Judiciary in Virginia - NO TRANSPARENCY and Judges chosen who will do as the “OLD BOYS NETWORK” wants them to do. 

Also Reported By:

 Home  Virginia Politics  VIDEO: Virginia Judicial Interviews Go “Off the Rails”; “Like a courtroom drama”;...  VIRGINIA POLITICS   VIDEO: Virginia Judicial Interviews 

• Go “Off the Rails”; “Like a courtroom drama”; “This is a f**king shitshow”  https://bluevirginia.us/2021/02/virginia-judicial-interviews-go-off-the-rails-like-a-courtroom-drama-this-is-a-fking-shitshow

Wow, what on earth is going on here?!?  Can’t wait to see the video…

• General Assembly’s judicial interviews devolve into ‘s***show’

By Ned Oliver -February 10, 202

https://www.virginiamercury.com/2021/02/10/general-assemblys-judicial-interviews-devolve-into-sshow/

• Channel 12  VIRGINIA MERCURY

General Assembly’s judicial interviews devolve into ‘s***show’   https://www.nbc12.com/2021/02/10/general-assemblys-judicial-interviews-devolve-into-sshow/

GENERAL ASSEMBLY  General Assembly judicial interview devolves into spectacle

NED OLIVER The Virginia Mercury

https://dailyprogress.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/general-assembly-judicial-interview-devolves-into-spectacle/article_757f0d64-6ca4-11eb-8770-231ac7ac2eea.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=email&utm_campaign=user-share

Ned, a Lexington native, has more than a decade’s worth of experience in journalism, beginning at The News-Gazette in Lexington, and including stints at the Berkshire Eagle, in Berkshire County, Mass., and the Times-Dispatch and Style Weekly in Richmond. He is a graduate of Bard College at Simon’s Rock, in Great Barrington, Mass. Contact him at noliver@virginiamercury.com

noliver@virginiamercury.com

Virginia Courts in Brief 

Virginia's Judicial System’s mission appears to ensure that unless you are “RICH and POWERFUL”  with the right connections to the “HOOKERS” Club or the “OLD BOY’S NETWORK”  you have no chance to win in an Honest Court in Virginia, as they do not exist.   

The Judges are all chosen by the Courts of Justice in “SECRET” and when a case becomes an issue they bring in a retired Judge to “FIX IT” for the appropriate party of Virginia's Judicial System to assure that the disputes are handled the way Chief Justice Lemons wants.

The present system consists of four levels of courts: the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals, the circuit courts, and the district courts. In addition, magistrates serve as judicial officers with authority to issue various types of processes. The courts are organized into 31 judicial circuits and 32 similar judicial districts. More than 2,600 people, including judges, clerks, and magistrates, work within the judicial branch of government with the goal of providing the citizens of the Commonwealth prompt, efficient service.

In December of 2020 the following Judges were questioned by the public:

The Public was treated rudely and ignored.  That in January the Judges were re-appointed with no discussion by the Courts of Justice.  The Courts of Justice mostly practicing lawyers in front of the Judges they appoint. 

Judge	Link
JIRC Members Judge James E Plowman & citizen Terrie N Thompson Virginia Courts of Justice renewal	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dxrZ8kccL4&t=336s Judicial inquiry review commission aka the JIRC.  Reviews the judicial complaints in Virginia. It basically ignores your complaint of a Judge.
Judge Kemler citizens speak at Virginia Judicial Review 11Dec20	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkt9DZsiUQc&t=555s City of Alexandria Chief Judge Kemler citizens speak at Virginia Judicial Review 11Dec20 Cases of Complaint Mike Field, Janice Wolk Grenadier, Natalia Dalton, Said Chamone and many more
Judge John Tran Fairfax County, Virginia Judicial Review	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QY-8lfejP1Y&t=40s Judge John Tran rewarded a Judgeship for what he did to Janice Wolk Grenadier through the law firm DiMuroGinsberg where Ben DiMuro announced years ago his donation of 10% of his estate to the Virginia State to buy his and his buddies freedom of the Ethics Rules and other Rules of the VSB
Judge Carroll A. Weimer Jr Prince William County, Virgina Judicial Reviews	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsjM3KC6Quc&t=42s Judge Carroll Weimer of PWC further supported and empowered Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman in the Sonia Grenadier Trust Thefts through her law firm
Judge Pamela O’Berry Judicial Review Part	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNzcYCEa5LA&t=93s The state of Virginia held Judicial Reviews   reviews for the following year December 11, 2020
Judge Pamela O’Berry - Chesterfield VA Part 2 11Dec20 Judicial Reviews	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XP2GUWhQetE&t=29s On Friday, December 11, 2020 the Virginia courts of justice Senate and delegates heals The Judicial reviews. Virginia and South Carolina are the only two states where the legislature chooses their judges. All other states vote on there judges. The public has the ability to have a say in their Judges.
Matt Skarlatos speaks our against Judge Thomas P. Sotelo Fairfax Va	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbUByHOdHT0&t=45s Virginia judicial reviews by the courts of justice committee of the Virginia legislature on December 11, 2020

THERE ARE NO HONEST COURTS IN VIRGINIA -

AND NOWHERE FOR YOU TO GO FOR HELP