Skip to main content

The State of Pennsylvania "Cash for the Elderly" is MURDERING the elderly for profit of Judges "friends"

The State of Pennsylvania "Cash for the Elderly" 
is MURDERING the elderly for the profit of Judges "friends"

Genevieve Bush 89 of Chester County, Pennsylvania

Before the Guardianship


Nearly a decade in, Genevieve Bush, 89, continues to be held in guardianship against her will, against 
advanced directives, her life savings is nearly depleted. 
The Estate Battle
Bush’s saga started approximately fifteen years ago, when Genevieve Bush’s sons, Joseph and Michael,
challenged the estate of her and her husband. 
After her husband had a stroke and was hospitalized in November 2003, they saw an opening,
according to a letter she wrote in 2007, to her brother Leon. 
“In April 2004, before Fabian (her husband) passed, Joseph asked me to sign a blank check…Joe asked
me to sign more blank checks so he could move the money…In May of 2005, Joe called me and told me
he was putting stocks in my name…Then, (a) month later in June, Joe Decided to give papers about me
being an estate, like I was already dead.”
At the time, Joseph and Michael had power of attorney power which Genevieve quickly sought to overturn
after the squabble turned bitter and wound up in court. 
“I, Genevieve Bush,” she stated in a notice of revocation of power of attorney dated September 6, 2005,
“do hereby revoke any and all powers of attorney given to Joseph Bush.” (she also revoked Michael Bush’s
power of attorney at the same time)
Four days later, the Chester County of Pennsylvania  Department of Aging showed up to test Genevieve,
according to the same letter, “On September 10, 2005, the Department of Aging came to Mary’s home
(where Genevieve was then staying) with the State Police and gave me a competency test.”
Genevieve stated that the Department of Aging came because Joseph complained to them. While she
passed the test, her ordeal was not over. 
“September 13, 2005, the Department of Aging came to my house. I told her to leave me alone.
‘This is all about money.’ That day all three sons called me on the phone. I guess they wondered if I
got removed from my home….We started the new year (2006) just great. Joe called threatening to call
the Department of Aging again.”
Bush hired attorney Jay Fischer to represent her and he sent a letter to Joseph on November 21, 2005,
stating in part. 
“In addition, you are requested to return all funds, investments or other accounts transferred into your
name to your mother immediately.”
Fischer continues to practice law in Pennsylvania but did not respond to a voicemail at his office. 
A court fight over the estate resulted and this even included a brutal deposition of Genevieve which lasted
between four and six hours. 
She described it in her letter. “All of them were there with lawyers. I brought a lady friend for support, but t
hey would not let her in. I felt attacked, question for four hours straight.”
The matter was finally decided on October 2007, when Judge Robert Shenkin ruled in favor of Genevieve’s
sons, that the monies were “gifted to them” according to a timeline Mary provided. 
The full letter Genevieve wrote is below.
The Incapacitated Claim
While Genevieve lost, Mary told me she still had over $1 million left after the settlement. She went ahead
with her life until 2009, speaking rarely to her sons. 
That all remained until on October 30, 2009, a petition was filed with the Chester County Orphans Court by
her two sons to have Genevieve declared incapacitated. 
“Now comes Joseph Bush and Michael Bush, sons of the alleged incapacitated person, Genevieve Bush, through
their attorney, Alex Chotkowski,” their petition stated, “and hereby Petition this Honorable Court for the
Declaration of Incapacitation and the Appointment of an Emergency Guardian for Genevieve Bush and an
An incapacitated person “means that you are not able to receive and evaluate information and communicate
decisions and that you are unable to manage your money and/or property, or to make necessary decisions
about where you will live, what medical care you will get, or how your money will be spent,” they stated in the
Chotkowski still practices law and continues to represent Joseph and Michael today but he did not respond to
an email for comment. 
When someone is accused of being incapacitated, their case goes to probate court as a guardianship or
sometimes called conservatorship. 
This is a civil, not criminal court, where the protections of a criminal court for an accused often don’t apply. 
Chotkowski described the reasons needed for the declaration in the petition. 
“Petitioners believe that guardians should be appointed for the alleged incapacitated person because the
alleged incapacitated person cannot manage her financial and cannot care for herself without the assistance of
skilled caregivers. The physical condition of the alleged incapacitated person is that she is in poor physical
condition due to her advanced age.
The matter wound up in front of Judge Katherine Platt. 
On June 24, 2011, Platt made her decision. 
“The nature of the condition or disability which impairs Respondent’s (Genevieve Bush) capacity to make and
communicate decisions is cognitive decline due to Alzheimer’s.” Platt stated in ruling her incapacitated. “The
extent of Respondent’s capacity to make and communicate decisions is severely impaired.”
But Mary Bush told me the hearing was a farce, Platt made the decision without giving Genevieve Bush any
chance to be heard, “Mom never had a single day in court and Judge Platt never met or saw my mother”, Mary
told me.
Furthermore, no one had claimed Genevieve ever had Alzheimer’s or claimed she had Alzheimer’s since 2006,
even though no such evidence was introduced. 
“The duration of such guardianship shall be permanent.” Platt stated, nonetheless in her decision. 
Judge Platt did not return a voicemail at her chambers and a subsequent email to Stacey Witalec, the press
contact for the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania, was also not returned. 
Judge Platt remains on the case today. 
The Uneasy Set-Up
Initially, there was an uneasy dynamic created. Mary shared guardianship with her brothers. Judge Platt
ordered Joseph to be guardian of the estate, while Michael and Mary were made guardian of the person. 
Genevieve initially lived at her home. 
It was a troubled dynamic that continued to be abusive to Genevieve, particularly when her sons petitioned
the court for another evaluation.
“AND NOW, this 12th day of February 2013, upon the Motion to Compel an evaluation of Mrs. Genevieve Bush
IP., by Movants Michael and Joseph Bush, it is hereby ordered,” Judge Platt’s order stated. 
They did this even though another court appointed evaluator submitted their report on October 21, 2011.
“Dr. Sarah Stookey, court appointed psychologist concluded her evaluation of Genevieve Bush that she became
very agitated around Michael and said to her ‘wants none of that’ when reminded of her session with Michael.
Judge Platt ignored the report from her own court appointed doctor.” Mary stated
This created all sorts of drama, particularly in arranging for this evaluation.
George Zumbano represented Genevieve during this period, and he sent a letter to Judge Platt stating. 
“I write to Mr. Chotkowski’s letter to you. First and foremost, this whole most unfortunate disagreement arises
because Mr. Chotkowski failed, contrary to your direction, to circulate the Order to counsel prior to submitting
it to Your Honor for signature.
“Be that as it may, let me simply address two brief issues. As to the 10:30AM time frame, we will do our best
with Mrs. Bush. My understanding was that she couldn’t be dressed, fed, etc. under her normal routine before
Zumbano continues practicing law but he did not respond to an email at his work email. 
The initial evaluation turned into a nightmare, according to an email from Mary’s then lawyer, Clifford Cohn to
Chotkowski from February 13, 2013.
 “Apparently a caregiver had to leave at 9AM. I understand the doctor did not feel comfortable interviewing
Mrs. Bush without someone else being present. As nobody else meeting the criteria as set forth in the order
had been obtained to stay with Mrs. Bush, she apparently left without doing the interview. I suggest we
reschedule as soon as possible.”
Cohn did not respond to a message at his office. 
At around this time, Mary was removed as guardian of the person by Judge Platt, and she was replaced by
Elizabeth Srinivasan in 2013. 
Srinivasan is an attorney who sometimes acts as a professional guardian; she did not respond to a message
at her office. 
In 2015, the Chester County Pennsylvania Department of Aging stepped in, Mary told me. 
“My mom was punched in her abdomen, (and the) department of aging removed her,” she told me. 
As a result, Judge Platt removed everyone from the guardianship matter and replaced them with Carol J Hershey,
who is also a professional guardian. 
Carol Hershey and the Vicious Cycle
Things have only gone from bad to worse for Mary, she told me. Her mother is now in a home, where Mary
provided PA Health Department citation evidence, she is not receiving proper care. 
“Based on a review of the facility abuse policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the
facility failed to fully investigate allegations of abuse to a resident,” according to a report about one facility
Genevieve stayed at. 
Mary also provided photos where her mom also appears isolated and mistreated. 

Hershey, “tried to charge me with trespassing, always maligned me, restricted visits,” Mary said, of the things
Hershey has done.
She said Hershey ordered that each visit be supervised and charge from $400-500 for a once a week visit.
Bush remains undaunted. 
On November 1, 2018, Judge Platt denied one of Mary’s motions; this, among other things, asked for Hershey to
be removed. 
On November 2, 2018, Judge Platt disregarding a higher courts order gave guardianship of the person back to
Michael Bush who did not file a petition, thus ignoring Mary again. The Pennsylvania Superior Courts Order
No. 3207 EDA 2015 dated February 21, 2017 (permanently removed Michael Bush as a Co-guardian or Plenary
Guardian of Genevieve Bush.) 
February 21, 2017, higher courts decision states on page 8; "The record supports the trial court’s findings and
conclusion that Michael’s appointment, as either sole or co-guardian of the person, would not fulfill Mrs. Bush’s
best interests. See 20 Pa.C.S.A. § 5521 (duty of guardian of the person to pursue an incapacitated person’s best
interest). Michael’s actions have ignored Mrs. Bush’s best interests." “he has been passive about her medical
care, physical therapy and encouraging her social life.”
On May 7, 2019, she sent Judge Platt what she referred to as a Memorandum of Understanding. 
“Let this be our Memorandum of Understanding, with all parties copied on the above-referenced issue;
that according to statements made by Terri Clark the Chester County Register of Wills/Clerks of the Orphan’s
Courts on May 6, 2019, to me Mary Bush, that you have given an Oral Order to the Clerk of the Orphan’s Court,
not to allow me access to any of the Guardianship Reports from 2015 to the present times that contains
substantive issues.
“As you know I have been a party to this matter of my natural mother Genevieve Bush since the onset of this
matter starting in 2009 to the present." Carol J. Hershey (professional for-profit guardian) “tried to charge Mary Bush (daughter) with trespassing, always maligned Mary Bush, restricted Mary Bush's visits,” this is just some, of the things Carol Hershey has done.

Mary Bush said Hershey ordered that each visit be supervised and charge from $400-500 for a once a week visit.

Mary Bush remains undaunted and willing to protect her mother to the best of her ability.

Written By: Michael Volpe has been a freelance investigative journalist since 2009.  In 2013 he gave the keynote address at the Eugene V. Katz Award Sponsored by the Center for Immigration Studies.  Since 2013. Volpe is the author of four books including Bullied to Death: Chris Mackney's Kafkaesque Divorce which exposes the Virginia Court corruption,  his latest, Sandra Grazzini-Rucki and the World's Last Custody Trial


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Commissioner Jon Norheim continues to be protected by Clark County leadership as evidence mounts of his estate trafficking for his cronies.

The criminal trial of attorney William Errico is to begin next month on June 17, 2019.  He is indicted on 34 counts of theft and exploitation for stealing over $150,000 from 67 year old client Deeann Clark’s medical malpractice award in 2007 and by using guardianship to steal over $800,000 of the personal injury award he had litigated for victim Wilfred Bosserman, 19 in 2009.  Mr. Errico effectively used Commissioner Jon Norheim to financially exploit a vulnerable adult, Wilfred Bosserman and his mother Angela Smalley.  Angela Smalley and LVMPD exposed Errico to Commissioner Norheim in early 2012 and Norheim took the opportunity to remove Wilfred’s mother as guardian of the estate and protect Mr. Errico while rewarding attorneys Lee Drizin and Michael Van until Norheim was removed from the adult guardianship bench in 2015.  The case languished for 7 years as Errico, through his attorney Bill Terry, avoided prosecution.  Errico was ultimately disbarred in late 2018. In a se

Virginia State Bar Corruption Exposed by:

Virginia State Bar Corruption exposed Sunday, February 18, 2018 E. Grier Ferguson protection racket Exposing the Syndicate of the E. Grier Ferguson Protection Racket (Part 1) The  Virginia State Bar's protection racket  surrounds E. Grier Ferguson and consists of the following facts connecting the VSB protection syndicate to Mr. Ferguson. In our previous posts we focused on the details of E. Grier Ferguson's abuse of the elderly and financial exploitation of his clients.  Click here to read E. Grier Ferguson's abuse of his elderly clients Suffolk Commonwealth Attorney  C. Phillips Ferguson  is E. Grier Ferguson's brother who shields Grier from criminal charges.  C. Phillips Ferguson has been an elected member of the Virginia State Bar C

The VIRGINIA STATE BAR Misuse of POWER to Silence Rhetta M. Daniel

A feud lasting nearly four decades between a Virginia lawyer and the Virginia State Bar (VSB) is coming to a head Daniel and the VSB Rhetta Daniel has been practicing law in Virginia for almost forty years; from 1982 - 1920 she worked as a Senior Assistant Bar Counsel for the VSB, prosecuting bad lawyers for them. These proceedings could lead to the removal of a lawyer's license to practice law, and as such their ability to continue to practice law. Daniel said she was pushed out as the Senior Assistant Bar Counsel in 1990 after it became clear that her aggressive style was not welcome and that the VSB was more interested in protecting connected attorneys than weeding out unscrupulous ones. The specific case was My Linh Soland, a client who had two powerful lawyers. "What they did was protect her defense counsel,"  Daniel said. She explained that a letter that may have doctored the attorney's letterhead was in the possession of her

Wells Fargo Bank Illegal Foreclosure of 15 W. Spring St., Alexandria, VA

  You may have seen 15 W. Spring St., Alexandria VA on the Market FOR SALE The SALE is in REVENGE by TROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS aka MAYS & VALENTINE For EXPOSING Their MANIPULATION and TAMPERING with or STEALING FROM TRUST ACCOUNTS that they MANIPULATED $30.000.00 in 1990 from Janice Wolk Grenadier to COVER-UP TROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS aka MAYS & VALENTINE - claims to be the lawyer for Wells Fargo Bank -"OOPS" Wells Fargo Bank in taped conversations and when responding to subpoenas had no clue TROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS aka MAYS & VALENTINE was or is their lawyer Read More: The home was illegally foreclosed on in March of 2018 It was an illegal Foreclosure - Here are the documents to prove it: It has been stated

The Virginia Swamp aka The Supreme Court / The Judicial Council Removes Citizens Rights to FREEDOM OF SPEECH

  THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA aka THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL  and THIER LOBBYIST  Taking Virginia Citizens' 1st Amendment Right to FREEDOM OF SPEECH With these changes asked and lobbied for by the Supreme Court of Virginia and the Judicial Council  the Citizens of Virginia if they comment online about a Judge et al will be sentenced to 6 months in jail 2023 SESSION history  |  hilite  |  pdf  |  print version 23101590D HOUSE BILL NO. 2024 Offered January 11, 2023 Prefiled January 10, 2023 A BILL to amend and reenact §§  18.2-186.4 ,  18.2-186.4:1 , and  24.2-418  of the Code of Virginia, relating to personal information of judges and magistrates; penalty. ---------- Patron-- Leftwich ---------- Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice ---------- Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia: 1. That §§  18.2-186.4 ,  18.2-186.4:1 , and  24.2-418  of the Code of Virginia are amended and reenacted as follows: §  18.2-186.4 . Use of a person's identity with the intent to coerce

Should a Judge be allowed to steal a child from a Mother without knowing the full story and Lawyers gaslighting and or not telling the whole TRUTH of the issues

Should a Judge be allowed to steal a child from a Mother   without knowing the full story and Lawyers gaslighting and or not telling the whole TRUTH of  the issues A Virginia Mom  faces the loss of her parental rights for a son she primarily raised for the first six years of his life. The Set Up Natalia Dalton in the City of Alexandria, Virginia spent the first six years of her sons life as his primary caregiver. She and her ex-boyfriend Julio LaCayo had a son  in 2008. They were never married, and custody was always arranged in some part through court orders the entirety of her son’s life. For the first six years of his life, Natalia had physical custody, her son thrived in school under her care. “There was one court hearing during that time over the sons passport.” Dalton noted. In 2013, that all changed. Indeed, the custody arrangem


ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA (June 16, 2018) -- A young mother was jailed on Friday morning for reporting physical abuse of her son by his father to the proper government authorities and for communicating with her 10-year-old son's therapist and psychiatrist.   Hard to believe?  The court reporter transcripts reveal it all in Cases CJ 14001064 and 14001065 in Alexandria Circuit Court. These facts are beyond question.  Judge Lisa Kemler announced her reasons for sentencing Natalia Dalton to jail in open court June 15, before a court reporter. Natalia Dalton's attorney is Jonathon Moseley of Woodbridge (703) 656-1230.   Natalia Dalton's son has told many adults, without prompting, that his father Julio Lacayo has physically abused him (that is in violence).   Natalia Dalton shows the photographs of her own injuries when she says Julio Lacayo beat her when they lived together.  The courts have no interest in Natalia Dalton being beaten by the child's father in years past

THE GRAND JURY An Independent ARM of Government not Administrative

  THE GRAND JURY An Independent ARM of Government not Administrative What is ??? was launched July 4, 2020, by Founder Janice Wolk Grenadier, a place that gives a voice to all Americans.  “Make America’s Judiciary Accountable”   As we are on the cusp of 2021, I hope you will consider a donation to to “fast and furiously” be able to change the judiciary and bring justice to many Americans who every day are at a loss as to what happened to them in the courtroom.  To donate go to the website and donate through PayPal, or Zelle 202-368-7178.   Because it has become self-evident that the Judiciary, Governmental and Elected Officials have proven they cannot police themselves: Our goal is to ensure that the American people are given Justice Evenly and Fairly without prejudice... The end result will bring us back to justice and take care of the waste of tax dollars and the many who are falsely imprisoned.    To protect t

The Rule of Law In the USA - Lost Due to the Corruption of Judges

“97” Elizabeth “Betty” Winstanley “KIDNAPPED” held hostage at Masonic Village, Elizabethtown Pennsylvania, “Embezzlement” of her financial means by Judge Jay Hoberg and “Cronies”

“97” Elizabeth “Betty” Winstanley “KIDNAPPED” held hostage at Masonic Village, Elizabethtown Pennsylvania, “ Embezzlement ” of her financial means by Judge Jay Hoberg and his “Cronies”  By: Michael Volpe The abuse continues for Elizabeth "Betty" Winstanley and her children (David Winstanley and Liz Winstanley) f ighting for her as the Lancaster, County Court of Common Pleas continues to abuse her and her family without end. Ms. Winstanley has been in an illegal guardianship since 2014, with all of her rights removed, forced to live at Masonic Village in Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania rather then Annapolis, Maryland which she has been petitioning the court since 2014 to be close to David and Liz her children. The day she was illegally found incapacitated in 2014 by Judge Jay Hoberg who only listened to his personal friend and doctor. That morning she was denied her hearing aids by Masonic Village so she couldn't hear the hearing. At this hearing remembe