Skip to main content

Chief Judge Lisa B. Kemler of the City of Alexandria Jails MOTHER FOR TALKING TO HER YOUNG SON'S DOCTORS AND REPORTING FATHER'S PHYSICAL ABUSE OF HER SON


ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA (June 16, 2018) -- A young mother was jailed on Friday morning for reporting physical abuse of her son by his father to the proper government authorities and for communicating with her 10-year-old son's therapist and psychiatrist.  

Hard to believe?  The court reporter transcripts reveal it all in Cases CJ 14001064 and 14001065
in Alexandria Circuit Court. These facts are beyond question.  Judge Lisa Kemler announced her reasons for sentencing Natalia Dalton to jail in open court June 15, before a court reporter.
Natalia Dalton's attorney is Jonathon Moseley of Woodbridge (703) 656-1230.  

Natalia Dalton's son has told many adults, without prompting, that his father Julio Lacayo has
physically abused him (that is in violence).  

Natalia Dalton shows the photographs of her own injuries when she says Julio Lacayo beat her when they lived together.  The courts have no interest in Natalia Dalton being beaten by the child's father in years past.

In November 2017, Natalia Dalton took her son Ethan to meet with the Magistrate for the City of Alexandria.  The 10-year-old son met alone with the Magistrate for 15 minutes, while the son told his story alone to the Magistrate.  Witnesses testified in the court case watching this.

In response, the Magistrate issued an Emergency Protective Order, ordered the child removed from the father's home, sent the police to serve the father who was heard by other witnesses screaming violently during this encounter and ordered the police to escort the son to retrieve his belongings.

The father's attorney got the case dismissed without there ever being a hearing the next day.  The father then took the son out of school early, before the end of the school day, and began to homeschool him.  So right after the Magistrate's order, the father removed the son from the presence of any adults who could learn about the abuse and report it.  The son has not been back to a regular school since the day after the Magistrate's order finding abuse. Judge Kemler ignored the father's efforts to prevent discovery of the abuse by any adults and ignored Laurie Best's reports of the abuse made only about a month ago after supervised visits by an adult monitor were ordered.  After the father testified to the sons' need for structure, he has home-schooled the son, obviously to prevent discovery of the abuse, certainly not to provide the structure he claims the child thrives on.

A month ago, a supervised visitation "monitor" Laurie Best appointed by Judge Kemler also reported the son's account of physical abuse to Child Protective Service.  Laurie Best testified that in the trial (on the transcript) that what the son volunteered to her triggered her legal mandatory reporting requirements.

Judge Kemler refused to call the son to speak for himself in the court hearing.  The father's attorney objected to allowing the son to be interviewed in chambers by Judge Kemler or to testify.  The only judicial officer to hear the son's story found a credible threat of physical abuse by the father and ordered the son out of the father's home.  Again this is all in the transcript.

Yet Judge Kemler announced in her official decision that she was punishing the mother for making a report of the son's accounts of abuse to authorities.

Furthermore, Natalia Dalton repeatedly warned her son's psychiatrist that the son was saying that the medication was causing alarming side effects, that her son had been placed on medication without proper preliminary testing, and that the son was reporting that the medication was interfering with his functioning, making him irritable, forgetful, disoriented, and feeling weird.

In the court case, Natalia Dalton was accused and punished for warning the son's prescribing psychiatrist of the adverse side effects of the medication.  

Throughout, the father's dishonest attorney offered a fairy tale that the son's reports of his problems were originating with the mother rather than being relayed by the mother from the son's own reports.

The only witnesses to conversations between the mother and her son were the mother and the son.  The father brought the accusations but objected to having the son testify or be interviewed in chambers.  Judge Kemler declined to hear from the son.

Natalia Dalton strongly and flatly denied ever sharing any of these concerns with her son, but only among the adults treating him.  There was absolutely no evidence or testimony to the contrary, nor was there ever going to be. The father brought a frivolous and sanctionable proceeding which he and his attorney knew at the time would never be supported by any evidence.  The mother's uncontradicted evidence stands fully established and "the law of the case." The problems were reported by the son himself, and the mother merely tried to give the son voice to those who needed to know.

About five other adults came to court to testify that the son also volunteered the same reports to them, but Judge Kemler would not allow them to testify to what the son said as being hearsay.

Natalia Dalton is raising money to pay for the transcripts.  Yesterday, her supporters set up a request for assistance at http://www.NataliaMom.com

On a small wage, Natalia Dalton is struggling to pay for the roughly $5,000 dollars in court reporter fees for the transcripts.



Chief Judge Lisa B. Kemler 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Billionaire Leon Cooperman - Altisource - OCWEN - PHH - NewRez

                    THE APPEARANCE of the MANIPULATION OF THE STOCK MARKET  BY THE RICH and POWERFUL In December 2019 a conversation with an insider of OCWEN tells why the assets were straddling NewRez what was behind the partnership.  “OCWEN was going into Bankruptcy and or Out of Business.” Around Two Thousand employees were let go.  The offshore and India offices were taking over telling American Citizens the lies that too much liability was now on the American employees. I then had a conversation with Leon Cooperman about the plans.  I explained to him how they still had an active loan in my name even though they had foreclosed on me.  The loan would change numbers and stay with NewRez. Micheal Martinez from Texas would harass me about a short sale on a home that had been foreclosed on.  He is now an agent and or in business with Troutman Pepper, Hamelton Sanders and OCWEN.   S. Moshin Reza of Trouman Pepper Hamelton Sanders also asked if I had talked with him and if I would agree

Wells Fargo Bank Illegal Foreclosure of 15 W. Spring St., Alexandria, VA

  You may have seen 15 W. Spring St., Alexandria VA on the Market FOR SALE The SALE is in REVENGE by TROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS aka MAYS & VALENTINE For EXPOSING Their MANIPULATION and TAMPERING with or STEALING FROM TRUST ACCOUNTS that they MANIPULATED $30.000.00 in 1990 from Janice Wolk Grenadier to COVER-UP TROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS aka MAYS & VALENTINE - claims to be the lawyer for Wells Fargo Bank -"OOPS" Wells Fargo Bank in taped conversations and when responding to subpoenas had no clue TROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS aka MAYS & VALENTINE was or is their lawyer Read More: https://judicialpedia.com/listing/criminal-trust-theft-by-lawyer-jim-arthur-of-troutman-pepper-hamilton-sanders-aka-mays-valentine-cover-up-of-trust-theft-by-divorce-lawyer-ilona-ely-freedman-grenadier-heckman-of-sonia-grenadier/ The home was illegally foreclosed on in March of 2018 It was an illegal Foreclosure - Here are the documents to prove it: It has been stated

The State's Responsibility to its Citizens in Relation to Its Employees

   The State's Responsibility to its Citizens in Relation to Its Employees The relationship between the state and its citizens is a complex and multifaceted one, with the state acting as a governing body responsible for the well-being and development of its people . One crucial aspect of this relationship is the state's responsibility towards its employees and the impact this responsibility has on its citizens. This article will explore how the state is accountable to its citizens for the actions of its employees and the implications this has for governance and public service. Accountability and Transparency is one of the key ways in which the state is responsible to its citizens for its employees is through accountability and transparency . As employees of the state, public servants are entrusted with the responsibilities of  1. upholding the law,  2. delivering public services, and  3. managing public resources.  The state has a duty to ensure that its employees carry ou

Did you know your STATE is responsible for damages done to you by JUDGES?

  The State's Responsibility to its Citizens in Relation to Its Employees The relationship between the state and its citizens is a complex and multifaceted one, with the state acting as a governing body responsible for the well-being and development of its people . One crucial aspect of this relationship is the state's responsibility towards its employees and the impact this responsibility has on its citizens. This article will explore how the state is accountable to its citizens for the actions of its employees and the implications this has for governance and public service. Accountability and Transparency is one of the key ways in which the state is responsible to its citizens for its employees is through accountability and transparency . As employees of the state, public servants are entrusted with the responsibilities of  upholding the law,  delivering public services, and  managing public resources.  The state has a duty to ensure that its employees carry out their duti

WHY DIDN'T YOU DO IT THE LAST 4 YEARS?

 The Fraud of Kamala Harris & Joe Biden They did not make Life Better - They weaponized the Courts, Our children are dying in droves and  13 Americans died at their hands and never have they really taken accountability  They love each other - But, they "HATE" you unless you have agreed to be a slave for them without speaking out against them - that is called Communism  Is that the country that you want to leave your children? Pew Studies show https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/08/26/the-political-values-of-harris-and-trump-supporters/   How we did this The 2024 presidential campaign has  changed dramatically  since Kamala Harris replaced Joe Biden as the Democratic Party’s nominee. What has not changed is the vast differences in political values between voters who support Harris and those who back Republican nominee Donald Trump. Following Harris’s extraordinary ascension to the top of the Democratic ticket, this publication and the accompanying  detailed tables  s

How Trump could have won 2020

  How Trump could have won 2020 There was Voter Fraud.  The Democrats have found a system through the “Deep State” How do we expose it?  On the ground with our local Grand Jury! Our Constitutional framers created 4 arms of Government:  the Executive Branch, the Legislature, the Judiciary, and the 4th Arm of Government for the People “THE GRAND JURY”. Our constitutional Framers thought of the sound Idea to create a structure allowing lay citizens to check government excesses.  The jury system, one of the most obvious and enduring of such structures was included in our governmental framework because of the widespread belief that the community's voice would ensure a more just judicial system.  Requiring community consent before changing or charging a person with a serious crime was considered so important that the grand jury structure was immortalized in the Bill of Rights. The first part of the Fifth Amendment reads as follows: “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or

Virginia Beach Sheriffs Assault 65-year-old ADA Advocate

  THE VIRGINIA SHERIFFS ASSAULT 65-year-old - white Certified ADA Advocate  By Sheriffs: Dickerson & Rupert While trying to keep eyes on a 140 lb Black man being over-mastered and also brutally assaulted  by Sheriffs The Rights of Individuals with Disabilities  The Importance of Having an ADA Advocate in the Courtroom The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) enacted in 1990 is a landmark legislation that provides comprehensive protections against discrimination for individuals with disabilities in various aspects of society, including the legal system. One crucial aspect of this protection is the right of individuals with disabilities to have an ADA advocate present in the courtroom. This explores the significance of this right and the impact it has on ensuring equal access to justice for individuals with disabilities. Ensuring Equal Access to Justice Individuals with disabilities, whether visible or invisible, may face unique challenges when navigating the legal system. From phy

Should a Judge be allowed to steal a child from a Mother without knowing the full story and Lawyers gaslighting and or not telling the whole TRUTH of the issues

Should a Judge be allowed to steal a child from a Mother   without knowing the full story and Lawyers gaslighting and or not telling the whole TRUTH of  the issues A Virginia Mom  faces the loss of her parental rights for a son she primarily raised for the first six years of his life. The Set Up Natalia Dalton in the City of Alexandria, Virginia spent the first six years of her sons life as his primary caregiver. She and her ex-boyfriend Julio LaCayo had a son  in 2008. They were never married, and custody was always arranged in some part through court orders the entirety of her son’s life. For the first six years of his life, Natalia had physical custody, her son thrived in school under her care. “There was one court hearing during that time over the sons passport.” Dalton noted. In 2013, that all changed. Indeed, the custody arrangem

The VIRGINIA STATE BAR Misuse of POWER to Silence Rhetta M. Daniel

A feud lasting nearly four decades between a Virginia lawyer and the Virginia State Bar (VSB) is coming to a head Daniel and the VSB Rhetta Daniel has been practicing law in Virginia for almost forty years; from 1982 - 1920 she worked as a Senior Assistant Bar Counsel for the VSB, prosecuting bad lawyers for them. These proceedings could lead to the removal of a lawyer's license to practice law, and as such their ability to continue to practice law. Daniel said she was pushed out as the Senior Assistant Bar Counsel in 1990 after it became clear that her aggressive style was not welcome and that the VSB was more interested in protecting connected attorneys than weeding out unscrupulous ones. The specific case was My Linh Soland, a client who had two powerful lawyers. "What they did was protect her defense counsel,"  Daniel said. She explained that a letter that may have doctored the attorney's letterhead was in the possession of her